Home

Previous 10

Aug. 9th, 2009

Altered Arthur


The Rise of General Arthur
phillip andrew bennett low
Augsburg Mainstage
2211 Riverside, Minneapolis

Sat., Aug. 1 @ 5:30 p.m., Sun., Aug. 2 @ 10:00 p.m. Tue., Aug. 4 @ 7:00 p.m. Wed., Aug. 5 @ 8:30 p.m. Sat., Aug. 8 @ 8:30 p.m.

http://www.fringefestival.org/2009/show/?id=975

"I sometimes wonder if it's me that's being made love to. I feel like I'm being harpooned by some raging monk in the act of receiving God."  Emily Jessup, Altered States.   

I saw Ken Russell’s adaptation of Paddy Chayefsky's novel in 1982 with a man who aspired to be Eddie Jessup.  I married him anyway.  When phillip andrew bennett low gets on the stage, I have flashbacks. 

This is an artist with a passion for Arthurian legend, who connects deeply – and I suspect quite personally - to the themes inherent in these texts: loyalty and betrayal, free will and destiny.  The quest that is at once choice and compulsion. The burden of trying – and failing – to live up to a moral standard that preserves the social order.  The uneasy harnessing of violence in its service.  What it means to be worthy of love.  And of allegiance. 

To set Arthurian themes in the context of the first Gulf War is intriguing – though I cannot say I understand more about the nature of either leaving the theater.  Nor am I sure I want low to push it.  A connection between Kennedy and Camelot – that I can stomach. 

I like to think at the Fringe.  I like to be challenged by the material.  I am grateful to anyone who sees fit to bring myth, legend, literature to the stage, and can get an audience to come out and watch it instead of sitting glued in front of the oxymoron that is Reality Television.  I may, in fact, be one of the few people in the universe who wants to see low do more work with the Gnostic gospels.  The piece I saw at Spirit in the House two years ago blew me away. I not only want to experience it again.  I want others to experience it.  I want others to understand why they should want to experience it.

The energy low pours into the esoteric, the unabashed love of brain food, his palpable, intense love of language – we need that.  He is clearly a genius.  But he pummels us with it.  Like Emily Jessup, I sometimes wonder why I am there.  Virtuoso performance does not draw you in.  It calls attention to itself.

I want to see low’s work with complex, difficult material become more accessible. Paradoxically, this means I want both more and less of him in the performance.  I want it to be less of a demonstration of how intelligent he is – we already know - and more an effort to engage the audience with the text.  To do this he has to care enough about that audience to move them through his own experience of it so they, too, get to feel that energy, that sense of connection, that intense love.  I am tired of being a voyeur.  And he is capable of more.  Of creating that altered state - in which both the individual and the community are fully present – which is the bard’s Holy Grail.  Whether or not he is a Rockstar.

Advertisement

Aug. 8th, 2009

Lily Was Right. Thank Goodness.

Katherine Glover

A Cynic Tells Love Stories

Augsburg Main Stage

2211 Riverside Ave., Minneapolis

Fri., Jul. 31 @ 10:00 p.m.., Sat. Aug. 1 @ 1:00 p.m. Sun., Aug. 2 @ 8:30 p.m., Thu., Aug. 6 @ 5:30 p.m. Sat., Aug. 8 @ 7:00 p.m. 

No matter how cynical you become, it’s never enough to keep up.  Lily Tomlin.

When the meltdown of my marriage began, I turned first to bibliotherapy.  By this I mean the “Relationships” section of Barnes and Noble. (Actually, with some premonition of my future economic state, I browsed at Barnes and Noble, wrote down the titles, and then surreptitiously took them out of the pubic library.) Phillip Blumstein and Pepper Schwartz’s Peer Marriage. John Gottman’s Why Marriages Succeed or Fail.  Peter Kramer’s “Should I Leave?  I was trying to work out the issues, trying on ideas.  It was all just theoretical. Ashton Applewaite’s Cutting Loose.  Constance Ahron’s The Good Divorce. Isolina Ricci’s Mom’s House, Dad’s House.  My library card knew what was happening before I did. 

“What is more important, passion or compatibility?” Katherine Glover asks in “A Cynic Tells Love Stories.”  I hear the question, coming from a woman whose parents divorced when she was three, and wonder if my own daughter, whose parents divorced when she was seventeen, asks herself the same question. Or if, like me, she sees this as a false dichotomy. 

False dichotomies make wonderful jumping off points, however.  By the end of the hour, Glover’s stories have addressed, in one way or another, all the necessary conditions for love:  Attraction.  Desire.  Trust.  Mutuality.  Respect.  Acceptance.  Commitment.  And a strong enough sense of self in each partner that both intimacy and autonomy are possible.  She does this in a way that is both smart and funny, without being sardonic.   Neither insight nor imagination is sacrificed to the god of Irony.

Gottman claims a lasting marriage is not about compatibility in the matchmaker’s sense at all – compatibility of interests, personality types, values, religious beliefs. If compatibility is necessary in any respect, it is in a couple’s style of handling conflict. Most of us have been trained to believe that a particular style of communication and compromise – validation - is required.  But Gottman’s research demonstrates that volatile couples – the passionate – have every bit as much a chance of achieving stability as those who avoid conflict altogether because they simply don’t see it as worth the trouble. Of course whether a lasting marriage is a healthy marriage is a different question altogether. 

“A good marriage,” someone once told me, “is one in which you are more yourselves together than apart.”  Is it cynicism to wonder how long any one relationship can really bear this burden? Why Marriages Succeed or Fail succeeded in describing my own dilemma precisely. I could see exactly how things had begun to go wrong. But it failed to convince me I could change anything. Like most people, we had waited too long. By the time criticism has turned to contempt, the damage has already been done. 

And yet there are couples who avoid this.  Whose relationships not only last, but stay healthy.  Is it because they manage to remain peers, to have an equal balance of power in the relationship? Equality is a straightforward concept; equity, less so, especially when children enter the picture. Do same sex couples have an advantage over heterosexual couples in this regard, as Blumstein and Schwartz suggest, because they organize their lives, and the roles they play, in ways that are essentially more egalitarian? I used to ask this of my gay friends on occasion.  Eventually I got tired of the uncontrollable laughter.

The story of Glover’s own brief marriage is told beautifully, with candor and compassion, and not a drop of self-pity. It made my heart ache.  In a good way.  In the end it is this story, which convinces me she is not, after all, a cynic.  Anyone who can see with such clarity, who can recreate each detail of a relationship – not without pain, perhaps, but in a conscious effort to move beyond bitterness - is not jaded – or closeminded - enough to qualify.  Nor does my daughter have to be. Stories like this are one of the reasons I see nurturing creativity as a moral imperative. 

Aug. 6th, 2009

Recovery Act

Curt Lund and  Laura Bidgood - What Happened? Productions
Slow Jobs:  Servicing America for $12 an Hour
U of M Rarig Center, Arena Stage
330 21st Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN

Friday, July 31; 8:30pm Sunday, August 2; 4:00pm Tuesday, August 4; 5:30pm Wednesday, August 5; 10:00pm Saturday, August 8; 8:30.  http://fringefestival.org/2009/show/?id=1105

In 2000, my daughter Maggie, then in the 8th grade, took a barrage of career aptitude tests. They were same ones I had taken the year before during my midlife career crisis, after spending ten years in the automotive industry, writing abstracts of technical articles for Ford Motor Company – a decade of my work life I prepared for by obtaining a doctorate in Victorian religious literature.  There is an art to titling the thesis, just as there is an art to titling a Fringe show.  Mine was “Remythologizing the Bible:  Fantasy and the Revelatory Hermeneutic of George MacDonald.” In the era of deconstruction, speech act theory, and dime-a-dozen doctorates, not exactly an academic hit. I had not taken career aptitude tests in the eighth grade.  I had taken Home Ec. 

How do these things happen?  Why do we end up where we do?

When her results came back, I asked Maggie what those tests said she should be when she grew up.  She did not hesitate for a moment.  “A Nobel Prize-winning author.”  You do not have to be a product of the Repository for Germinal Choice to aim high.  We were unable to find any colleges where she could major in Nobel Prize Winning.  But both her father and I believe that a strong liberal arts education is necessary to the development of critical thought and the exercise of imagination. These qualities create favorable conditions for finding right livelihood. That, at least, was an opportunity we could provide.

This May she graduated from Hamline – Phi Beta Kappa, with a double major in history and religious studies and an honors thesis with the impressive title “A’isha and Fatima:  Matriarchs and Sectarian Identity in Medieval Islamic Literature.”  The hits just keep on coming. She was the Multifaith Alliance Coordinator at Hamline from 2005 to 2009, and the Inaugural Steven and Kathi Austin Mahle Scholar for Progressive Christian Thought.  She won the Eliza M. Drew Award in History, the Senior Religion Major Award, the Alfred D. and Hazel Stedman Writing Award and the Louis Parish Award for Service to Religious Life, the latter two years in a row.  Am I proud?  Not a little. She spent her junior year abroad in Ghana, has three years of Japanese under her belt, a year of Spanish, and a smattering of Twi. She’s also a crackerjack web designer and an aspiring artist with a show opening up at Cosmic’s Coffee on Snelling in St. Paul Friday.

And unemployed.  And living in my home.  Yes, I can send you her resume. 

At the moment she is interviewing for jobs teaching English in Seoul.  Hamline has good ESL connections.  Apparently half the 2009 graduating class is heading for Korea, because there are NO JOBS here. They have national health insurance.  She is learning Korean. I never thought I’d see the day when I would have to send my daughter to a foreign country to improve her standard of living. Stay away from the border, I tell her.  If Bill has to bring you back, I will be very upset. 

How do these things happen?  How do we end up where we do? 

I am glad Curt Lund and Laura Bidgood have ended up here. Their show is a Recovery Act of its own. Go see it.  Not only are they funny and intelligent, thus fitting my Thinking Woman’s Fringe filter, but they clearly enjoy working together. Two people who have known each other since childhood and are still a creative inspiration to one another – this is a rare and wondrous thing.  Worth growing up in North Dakota for?  I’m guessing yes.

I don’t know Laura well (though I did once know a Loretta), but from our production of Saving Pagan Babies together with Ann Reay and Loren Niemi, at the Spirit in the House Festival in February, I know it is easy to enjoy working with Curt. He is an openhearted, unpretentious artist who manages to integrate that vocation into his day job as Marketing Director for the Minnesota Center for Book Arts. I am pretty sure he is hiding tights and a spandex suit somewhere. (We already know he has a cape.) Because that’s my idea of a superhero. It should definitely go into his – ahem – donor profile. Such qualities are a lot more important being six feet tall with blond hair, blue eyes and good muscle tone. 

Or, for that matter, winning a Nobel Prize.  Even at the Repository for Germinal Choice.

Aug. 5th, 2009

Take; eat.

Lane McKiernan
Food Shelf Follies
Playwright's Center
2301 Franklin Ave. E., Minneapolis


Fri., Jul. 31 @ 10:00 p.m., Sat., Aug. 1 @ 5:30 p.m., [A] Sun., Aug. 2 @ 1:00 p.m. Thu., Aug. 6 @ 7:00 p.m., Sun., Aug. 9 @ 5:30 p.m.

http://www.fringefestival.org/2009/show/?id=1078 

“I do not have any difficulty believing the Host is Christ’s body,” said my Roman Catholic friend.  “What I have trouble believing is that it is bread.”  Apparently, however, transubstantiation is a fragile process.  Because according to the Vatican, whether real bread or wafer, the priest can't make Jesus without gluten. 

Orders are orders.

My son had a teacher in the fourth grade, at Percy Priest Elementary School in Green Hills, Tennessee, who was a veteran of the first Gulf War.  Mr. Chase.  He was a former Green Beret.  Mr. Chase’s kids lined up differently in the hall from other kids.  They had more homework every night than other kids.  And they won all the contests on Field Day.  Had it been permitted, I think Mr. Chase might have had his students dig their own latrines.  Aidan simultaneously loved and feared Mr. Chase – both wanted his approval, and resented his discipline.   For a young man, however, Mr. Chase was sick a lot.  Gulf War Syndrome, we were told.  Chemical exposure.  Although he came home without obvious wounds, his immune system was shot.  He took medication for this, but it made him sleepy.  During the school year, if he was feeling well enough, he often reduced the dosage, something that was not recommended.  But a soldier needs to be alert.  So does a fourth grade teacher. 

Even if it means disobeying orders.

Several years after we left Tennessee, we heard Mr. Chase had died.  Not from Gulf War Syndrome, exactly.  From food poisoning.  He had eaten a rare steak, and the steak had contained e-coli.  Not a strain that would bother anyone else.  But toxic to him. 

On my way home from a meeting today, I had to stop at the grocery store.   I hadn’t had time to plan the week’s meals; I just knew I was out of a lot of what is normally considered healthy food.  (It should go without saying that this includes dark chocolate and whole bean coffee.)  I ended up in the grocery section of Super Target.  Several people have recently sent me that list known as the “dirty dozen” –fruits and vegetables whose pesticide content remains dangerously high, even after they are washed. So I went first to the organic produce counter.  What was there was small and mean looking, and expensive.  Most of it had been flown in from Mexico or South America.  I found organic chocolate, but none of it was fair trade.  There was organic, fair trade, whole bean coffee, but Eight-o-Clock was two dollars a pound cheaper.  And who was I trying to kid by paying a premium for “cruelty-free” meat?  Did the certification process include an interview with the Meat? 

After forty-five minutes of hemming and hawing, trying to determine the least damaging, most ethical and economical way of feeding myself, I finally said to hell with it, threw in my cart whatever looked good, and vowed to do better next time.

Not everyone has the luxury of being able to do this.  Lane McKiernan is one of those people.  A chemical exposure has made him allergic to a number of foods that you and I can still find nourishing – or at least nontoxic.  Finding foods that do not sicken him – learning to cook without gluten or wheat, avoiding the ubiquitous high fructose corn syrup - has been a difficult process, made even harder by periods of unemployment.  At one food shelf, when he tries to return things he knows he cannot eat so that someone else can benefit from them, the worker takes everything back.  “If you were really in need you would eat what we gave you.”  Water, water, everywhere, nor any drop to drink.  When your body itself becomes the albatross, what then do you do? 

Lane is not only chemically sensitive but transgender, and weaves this reality into the story with a refreshing matter-of-factness.  There are no identity politics here:  only a real person, with real needs.  He tells his story quietly, without rancor.  I have never heard anyone speak of working in a minimum wage, food service industry job with such obvious pleasure, even vocation; his description of early mornings at the bakery reminded me of Brother Lawrence, practicing the Presence of God.  Had you asked Brother Lawrence whether he thought gluten necessary for this, I think you would have gotten the answer such a question deserves.

You might think that Lane's show would be a preachy, uncomfortable experience.  Instead it is full of beautiful moments, both in the interludes of music and juggling by Walken Schweigert and Katie Burgess, and in the narrative itself.  There are kind people as well as the insensitive, unskilled in withholding judgment.  Lane presents them without comment.  That is life.  And this is advocacy at its finest, a call for justice which draws people in rather than shuts them out.  Anger is reserved for a system that fails the poor and the disabled, and for the elected officials who balance the budget on the backs of those least able to make their voices heard. 

And even anger with the system, and those who represent it, is tempered with humor.  When a social services bureaucrat accuses Lane of trying to get benefits with a fake ID because the gender on it is wrong, his bewildered response -  “I didn’t know whether to be upset at the accusation of fraud or pleased that I finally passed.”-  gently ushers me into his world and gives me a hook to hang my hat on.  It is the courage to laugh at such experiences that saves a person from despair – and feeds a community’s capacity for compassion.   Because in the end, we must all give.  And take.  And eat.   

Advertisement

Aug. 4th, 2009

*Not a Meat Pie

Nancy Donoval
Every Pastie* Tells A Story
Playwrights’ Center
2301 Franklin Ave E Minneapolis, MN 55406

Fri., Jul. 31 @ 7:00 p.m. Sat., Aug. 1 @ 8:30 p.m. Tue., Aug. 4 @ 10:00 p.m. Fri., Aug. 7 @ 4:00 p.m. Sat., Aug. 8 @ 7:00 p.m. 
http://www.fringefestival.org/2009/show/?id=1079

You will not learn to make them twirl.  There.  Let me get the only disappointing thing about this story out of the way.  If you were looking for pole dancing, you will also have to go elsewhere. 

I said I was attending the Thinking Woman’s Fringe, but that doesn’t mean I’m not seeing funny shows.  It’s just that all of the funny shows I am seeing are also intelligent.  Nancy Donoval’s storytelling flawlessly integrates humor and intelligence and I never get tired of hearing her tell.  Since I’m her Girl Friday this year, doing last minute errands, recording (when my recorder works), postcarding, fetching cups of hot tea, helping get the props off the stage at the end, I’m hearing her tell a lot.  Nancy’s stories are remarkable not only for their humor and intelligence, but for their accessibility.  You do not  need to be a “theater person” to be drawn into this tale –  you don’t need to have been a good Catholic girl, or even a girl.  Familiarity with Milwaukee – not required.  You only need to have once been young, and to have thought that the rest of your life was hanging on someone else’s opinion of your talent, your competence, your commitment.  Nancy makes it look easy, this storytelling business – natural, like a conversation.  But don’t be fooled – at each and every moment, she is a dancer on point – a consummate, meticulous artist with words.  The resolution of this story leaves you richer, more capable of humor, generosity and intelligence yourself.    

And in the spirit of that generosity, I pass on this resource.  Girl Fridays also do research.

Aug. 3rd, 2009

Barthelme the Scrivener

The Twisted Grin-Assorted Tales to Amuse and Alarm
Mindless Mirth Productions
Augsburg Studio
2211 Riverside Ave., Minneapolis, MN


Thu., Jul. 30 @ 10:00 p.m., Sat., Aug. 1 @ 5:30 p.m., Thu., Aug. 6 @ 8:30 p.m. , Fri., Aug. 7 @ 8:30 p.m. , [S] Sat., Aug. 8 @ 4:00 p.m.

http://www.fringefestival.org/2009/show/?id=974

Kenneth – what is the frequency? In 1986, Dan Rather was attacked by two men who repeatedly pummeled him for no obvious reason, and between beatings, asked this apparently absurd question. The crime was never resolved, though one of the assailants was eventually apprehended. But "Kenneth - what's the frequency?" made a neat song, one Rather got over his trauma long enough to enjoy singing it with REM.

Fifteen years later, iin Harper's Magazine, Paul Limbert Allman claimed he has solved the mystery of this curious assault, pasting together two apparently unrelated lines in Barthelme’s short story “The Indian Uprising” to come up with an equally absurd theory involving the Houston author. Allman has since conceded that he finds his own theory "difficult to accept," and that the assailants could also have been "loose cannons armed with quotes."

Which, interestingly enough, describes Barthleme to a tee. I suppose when you write surrealist fantasy and play with violent themes in fragmentary bursts of flash fiction, echoing the structure and logic of the schizophrenic mind, you should not be surprised when you end up being the source of inspiration for a pair of them - the Jodi Foster of Post-Modernism.

Alternatively, Paul Allman’s piece may in fact be a tongue-in-cheek tribute to Barthelme, who died in 1989. It was written in December 2001. If Barthelme had been alive to see the former Governor of Texas shift the blame for 9/11 from Osama Bin Laden to Saddam Hussein, he might have written just such a story himself.

I appear to be attending, courtesy of my talented and interesting friends, the Thinking Woman’s Fringe. (Although the Woman's Thinking Fringe makes a better acronym.) This has been making it hard for me to review performances in a timely fashion. I just get too caught up in exploring what I sampled afterwards. I have not read Barthelme in a long, loooong time – one short story in a graduate course on contemporary American short fiction at the University of Minnesota in 1979 really doesn't cut it. After having seen Larry Ripp’s Twisted Grin, I found myself wanting to go home and reacquaint myself with Barthelme’s work. This is relatively easy to do online. So I did. I wish I could take credit for the title of this review, BTW, but at least four others got there before me.

I am amazed that there appear to have been so few adaptations of Barthelme’s short stories to the theater. Beckett was a major influence, as were Sartre and Ionesco, and it shows. Many of Barhelme's stories are monologues, often with narrators of questionable reliability. The folks at Mindless Mirth Productions really have something here – though they might want to change their name. Because Donald Barthelme – while playful - is anything but a mindless experience.

Barthelme’s stories appeared mostly in the New Yorker, where for many I suspect they served the same purpose as the cartoons – short, sophisticated comic relief. Not to say that the stories are not challenging. They are, in fact, linguistic koans, semiotic puzzles. As one critic puts it, for Barthelme the highest success is not if the story strikes us as true, but rather if it shows us how it works. I had to learn a new word - heteroglossia - just to understand some of the criticism. Sometimes I am glad I am no longer an academic.

Turns out I enjoy Barthelme more as interpreted theatre than I do just reading him – though it was interesting in several of the pieces to see what Ripp omitted. There isn’t much, and it seldom does damage to the author’s intention. Of course if it did, Barthelme, an academic himself, could hardly complain. He has read his Husserl, his Heidegger, his Barthes and Derrida. No doubt he has told bar stories at MLA conventions with Frederic Jameson and Stanley Fish. Even now the tenure of entire English faculties depended on an ideology which permits, even encourages, the subversion of authorial intent. The editorial changes of one little Fringe Festival playwright don’t mount to a hill of beans in that town.

Jon Eichenlaub does an excellent job with Some of Us Have Been Threatening Our Friend Colby, which is taken almost verbatim from the text, but my favorite stories are those in which the author backs away from fragmented absurdity and meaningless violence as abruptly as he engages it, and imagines instead a different world. We know that this world is as fragile, and as possible, as the other, and yet ending there in some way gives hope. Life is absurd, and we make stupid, even cruel mistakes, but people are essentially good. Sure, the narrator in I Bought a Little City shoots six thousand dogs, proving that power – and capitalism - corrupt. But on deciding he doesn’t like the experience, he just gives it up. At least that’s how it appears in the abridged version. “Took a bath on that deal,” he says cheerfully. And learned not to play God. “A lot of other people already knew that, but I have never doubted for a minute that a lot of other people are smarter than me, and figure out things quicker.” His commentary on the nature of God’s own apparently sadistic imagination - “He does a lot worse things every day” – loses some depth and resonance with the elimination of Sam Hong’s wife. But the essential meaning comes across.

There are times when I sense more gravitas in Barthelme than comes across in Twisted Grin. Like I Bought a Little City, The School, perhaps, loses a bit of its complexity, feeling more like a Saturday Night Live sketch (hence the Mindless Mirth) than a piece that genuinely addresses existential questions. Is it death that gives meaning to life? Or life itself which is its own meaning? Either I blinked or an element rather critical to the ending of that particular story was missing - an element similar to the absence of Sam Hong's wife. Missing that context, I was distracted at first by not knowing whether the narrator was herself a sociopath, or a jinx, or whether the students at the school were just us, confronting what we all must confront –that life, in the end, will kill you. There is also a whiff of Cold War to “The School,” as if it was written in response to the actual absurdity of schoolchildren crouching under desks to protect themselves from nuclear attack. (I was there. We did this.) Yet the story that remained fit the character Rose Johnson portrayed, and I especially enjoyed her expressiveness and comic timing.

Gravitas is there, if you wish to find it. And affirmation of what is beautiful and joyous in life, amidst the absurdity. My favorite story (as anyone who knows me could probably guess) was A City of Churches which for some reason I will probably never know, is available online in English and Chinese. Like another reviewer who claims he “went to that school,” I have done time in that city, which has a peculiarly Southern feel to it. I feel like Barthelme has stared with me down the length of Hillsboro Parkway in Nashville, where the steeples line up like missile silos. A city where you can “live in the church of your choice.” A choice as American as the color palette of a Model T. Vickijoan Keck’s portrayal of the young woman looking for an apartment in Prester, who has already been offered a job as their “car rental girl” despite the fact that everyone has a car in Prester and nobody wants to leave it, is spot on. She has the ability to act whatever age the part demands, which is a rare gift. For the most part, Cecelia (her name in the story; I do not believe it is mentioned in the play) is the rational voice, the reasonable outsider. Of course she will not take a job renting cars in a town where no one rents cars. That makes no sense. Of course she will not live in a belfry apartment. That would be bats. Are we in the Twilight Zone? But when her guide asks, quite pointedly, what denomination she is, the woman responds with an apparent non sequitur that explodes any precoonceptions we might have had about her character:

"I can will my dreams," Cecelia said. "I can dream whatever I want. If I want to dream that I'm having a good time, in Paris or some other city, all I have to do is go to sleep and I will dream that dream. I can dream whatever I want."

In the end, the guide’s insistence that Cecelia must stay “for balance” – that they need a car rental girl to make their town complete and thus perfect, to quell their own restlessness with the illusion of opportunity – has a certain menace to it. And yet Cecelia – who the narrator of “I Bought a Little City” would recognize immediately as “too imaginative” - threatens to break open their perfection, shake things up. Who will win?

I will admit this story has an idiosyncratic, personal meaning for me. In a past life I lived inside many churches. I know, in less than playful terms, what that does to a woman’s dreams. Especially a woman who is “too imaginative.” So I’m rooting for Cecilia. Dream on, baby.

Aug. 1st, 2009

Guilt Trip

From July 30-August 9, I will be reviewing Fringe Festival shows.  Reviews will appear on the Minnesota Fringe Festival website of each show, although long reviews will be truncated.  All reviews will also appear here.  For general information about the Minnesota Fringe Festival, go to www.fringefestival.org .  

Death Camp Diaries
Howard Lieberman / Jaded Optimist Productions
U of M Rarig Center Xperimental
July 30 @ 5:30, July 31 @ 8:30, Aug 2 @ 7:00, Aug 5 @ 7:00, Aug 8 @ 4:00
 

http://www.fringefestival.org/2009/show/?id=991

What is the difference between a pilgrim and a tourist?  And which one is Howard Lieberman – devout agnostic, secular Jew – as he “does” the Death Camps?   Your guess is as good as Howard’s.  Because clearly he identifies with both.

We know what a pilgrim is, don’t we?  One whose journey into sacred space is a quest.  A tourist – well, a tourist is just on vacation.  A pilgrim encounters the Other.  A tourist consumes it.  Been there, done that.  Got the t-shirt. 

And yet the distinction is not so simple, and never has been.  Nor is it simple for Howard.  The honesty and ironic humor with which he explores that paradox in himself is one of the best elements of Death Camp Diaries.  If Howard is going to go on a psychologically grueling journey, he will at least travel first class.  Not with those other Jews, always looking for a bargain.  He will stay in a nice hotel.  Living well is the best revenge, isn’t it?  He will find a good jazz club, and friend the vocalist on Facebook. 

Pilgrims have been tourists since the merry band of the Canterbury Tales first got the springtime itch.  The rich Saracen and his entourage were a major force in the economy of every little oasis on his haj.  For better or for worse, trade, travel and transformation have always been entwined. 

Transformation is never a one way street.  If you cannot visit the Death Camps without being transformed, you also cannot do so without contributing to the economy of the descendents of those who ran them.  It is easy for the locals to resent tourists.  They swarm everywhere, make the check out lines longer, insist you speak English.  Is it Anti-Semitism I saw in their eyes, these people who claim they never knew?  Or are we just being Ugly Americans?

This is a once in a lifetime experience, the Orthodox rabbi said.  One you will be processing for a long time.

Howard had been back two days when he opened at the Fringe.  Where he finally really does have a Good Venue.  The fact that this is a work in progress does not bother me in the least.  We are all works in progress. 

Besides, I love watching Howard grow.  In many ways all of his previous work as a storyteller – particularly his most recent performance in June with Noa Baum at Loren Niemi’s venue, Two Chairs Telling – has been preparation for this experience, so that even in its rawness, certain themes are emerging.  The one that intrigues me most is the quest for identity, and how inseparable this is from community, even when an iconoclast like Howard defines himself against it.  

“You call yourself a Jew?”  The Orthodox says this to the Conservative, the Conservative says this to the Reformed - and all of them say this to Howard.  Who gets to decide?  Enquiring Howard wants to know.  What does it mean to be a Jew?  Is this a cultural category, an ethnicity, or a religion?  I like the rabbi; I like my brother and his wife, who are also on this trip – but the rest?  Do I really even want to associate with these people, with their narrow perspectives and prejudices, their “organized superstitions,” their lack of taste?    If I don’t, who am I? 

One way of handling this dilemma is to plunk yourself down in Lutheran Minnesota, where you are Jewish by default.  No need to Measure Up.  Or, for that matter, to Put Up With.  But there are limitations to this approach. 

Academia has a special word for people who go sightseeing at scenes of death:  they are thanotourists.   There are less intimidating, but no less equally bizarre alternative phrases:  dark tourist, grief tourist.  The category includes trips to the sites of battlefields, cemeteries, natural and unnatural disasters, prisons, slaveholds.  Concentration camps.  You do not need to travel outside the United States to be a thanotourist – you can go to Gettysburg, Wounded Knee, New Orleans, Ground Zero, Alcatraz, Manzanar.  Eventually, no doubt, if we ever find homes for the current tenants, you will be able to tour Guantanamo.  And take home a refrigerator magnet.

Thanotourists are not necessarily morbid – though Sarah Vowel capitalizes on that brand, and builds much of the quirky appeal of Assassination Vacation upon it.  Theirs are educational trips.  This is a safe, neutral term – even a secular humanist can use it.  But is it enough to call visiting the site of an atrocity “educational”?  When you can map an archipelago of such sites  across Europe?   And visit them on a package tour? 

George Santayana said that those who cannot remember history are condemned to repeat it.  The spate of “histories” purporting that the Holocaust didn’t happen are reason enough to justify the trip.  See for yourself – and never forget. This is one of the primary justifications for atrocity tourism, which comes close to being a moral obligation for Jews and Christians alike.  For different reasons.    

In the middle of the journey of our life
I came to myself within a dark wood
where the straight way was lost.

It didn’t matter to the Nazis if you were a good Jew, a bad Jew, or even a practicing Jew.  What mattered was that you were vermin.  To visit the camps as a Jew is to confirm your solidarity with other Jews – whether you are Orthodox, Conservative, Reformed, secular, or Devout Agnostic.  Whether you live in Israel, or Brooklyn, or Stillwater. 

Those of you who know Howard know that he is always threatening to get naked on stage.  What’s different is that this time he does it.  And that it is not gratuitous.  Indeed, it was one of the most moving parts of the performance.  I do hope that by now he has stopped apologizing for possibly offending people for this afterwards.  Although the fact that I do not believe there was originally a nudity warning on the Fringe site might have been the real issue.

 If I was offended by anything, it was by the way he occasionally lumped all his audience members together as “you Christians” – as if he was the only Jew in the room.  As if there were only two religions in Minnesota.  As if we were all religious.  At times Howard’s attempt to talk about his own prejudices seemed unreflective, which I do not think was intentional.  But admitting that you stereotype Poles at one point and that you know those stereotypes are not an accurate reflection of reality, then talking as if those stereotypes were true several minutes later was confusing.  Which Howard am I listening to now – the one reacting to his experience, or responding to it?    The one who is buddies with the great grandson of the King of Poland, or the one who is convinced that given the chance, the bastards would all do it over again?

Like another reviewer, I would like to see this again in a year, or two, or five.  While I deeply respect the authenticity of Howard’s personal experience, I cannot really say I was challenged by the piece – though it was clearly heartfelt.  But though I am not a member of any organized religion, I have been so.  And I know that religious people have the capacity for complex and nuanced thought. Unlike Howard, I don’t happen to believe religion is “organized superstition,” and I have a healthy appreciation for the Jewish theologians who have struggled with this problem – Emil Fackenheim, Richard Rubenstein, Arthur Cohen – in ways that did indeed challenge me, and remain with me, even after thirty five years.

I cannot say I know these thinkers well.  But the fact that I do know them is attributable to an Introduction to Religion class taught thirty five years ago at a small Catholic university in the southern tier of New York State.  By a Franciscan friar.  Father Tony Struzcynski.  I think he was Polish.

Advertisement

Jun. 26th, 2009

Catching Up

I’ve had a couple of people ask if I dropped them, accidentally or on purpose, off my Ordinary Time list.  In truth there has been very little of the ordinary to my time recently – or I haven’t been sure what the real ordinary is.   

The last time I sent out a broadcast email with blog links was after the entry on September 14, "Chiropractic" about my friend Nancy's clinic visit.  “Going Down” (a story which is economic, not erotic, but at least I got your attention) followed, and then “American Zombie” – a pre-election Halloween story about watching Night of the Living Dead with my Crisis Connection colleagues while passing out candy to future voters:  little Spidermen and Hannah Montanas.  As I hand them Snickers to keep them satisfied, I wonder if their parents have dental, and if I am liable for root canals.   

On my hard drive recently I found an aborted fragment of an Epiphany letter - essentially my version of a story of Maggie’s that gripped me so powerfully I never got beyond it to talk about the rest of the family.  I posted that as a blog entry.  The next entry is the story I performed for the Spirit in the House festival, “Two Falling Voices,’ in late February and early March.  And then silence.   

Not the way to make your fame and fortune blogging. 

But creative writing has never been about either for me.  Although I certainly wouldn’t mind getting paid for it.   Maggie even got me signed up for my first course at the Loft that was actually about trying to sell a piece of writing, though this week we switched to a course on travel writing because the time worked better for her.  Still, the essential purpose is insight, not income. There is a process of making myself aware, and then sharing that awareness with others, that is lifegiving.  Of recognizing beauty in the texture and complexity of life   Of transmuting suffering.  One of my friends, Rose Arrowsmith DeCoux, a very talented young storyteller and writer, calls her business Alchemy StoryWorks. There is more than Harry Potter chic to such a moniker.  Those of us who know this secret have found the Philosopher’s Stone.   

Trust the practice.  Trust the creative process.  Trust yourself.  Then there’s nothing to fear.  That mantra, paraphrased from John Daido Loori's The Zen of Creativity, has been my touchstone – my tool for finding gold, if not creating it - for the last two years.  Creative writing is something I find I must do, like eating and drinking, or my spirit wastes away. I would say it is like breathing – that would be very Zen – but I am certain I cannot hold my breath as long as I have gone without writing.  I could probably not go without water that long either.  If I stopped eating as long as I’ve stopped writing… well, I would certainly not be facing that extra twenty pounds on the scale again.  This is worth considering.

Storytelling allows me an outlet that does not depend upon connections with publishers.  It gives me a audience – not to gratify my vanity so much (though this can be a pleasant side effect) – but to teach me - with an immediacy that the written page cannot - how to shape a piece so that it means something to someone other than me.  And blogging allows me to share my writing with you.  Right now, that is enough.   Because I have found right livelihood through another kind of writing.  At least for the time being.

Since the beginning of the year I have been a full time freelance grantwriter – a move I chose with intention in August of 2008, a month before the economy crashed.  Great timing, huh.  

Most people do not go to school to be grantwriters.  I’m no exception.  I’m one of Garrison Keillor’s English majors in supersaturated form – I have a Ph.D. in Victorian religious literature, having written a thesis with the impressively esoteric title Reconstructing the Bible:  Fantasy and the Revelatory Hermeneutic of George MacDonald -  but I tell people that I’ve always gotten a job in spite of that.  First technical writing for the automotive industry – for which Victorian literature is interesting preparation – then grantwriting and organizational development.

I finished the draft of my thesis a week before Maggie was born in Port Huron, Michigan, and defended it at the University of Minnesota six months later while Paul walked back and forth with her in a front pack at Coffman Union, hoping they would finish grilling me before she needed to nurse.  The full sized, bound copy with the title and my name in gold letters ended up on one of the shelves of patio bricks and boards that served as our bookcase as students.  They were mine originally – I stained the boards, and the bricks are green, not gray, a rare element of style back then – and we lugged the damn things from Minneapolis to Chicago to Port Huron to Dearborn to Nashville to Sewanee and to Nashville again before bringing them back up with us to the house we bought in Eden Prairie. Post-divorce, they are once again mine.  The fruit of my scholarship sits upon them, between an oversized copy of Dante’s Inferno, with the illustrations by Gustave Doré, and volume 9 of the Dictionary of Literary Biography. The latter contains the only article I ever published under my maiden name, back when I was not a Victorian scholar, but an Americanist – the entry on Edna Ferber. For anyone out there who can tell me one thing she wrote without doing a Google search, the drink’s on me. 

I take that back.  The Inferno apparently stayed with Paul.

When I first began working for the Institute for New Americans in 1999 – can this really have been a decade ago?  - it was because of two grants I had written almost twenty years before while a research assistant for Don Ross in the Program in Composition and Communication.  That research got me to my first and only Modern Language Association convention in 1982, while I was still ABD – all but dissertation.  I had three job interviews there, all of them composition and computer related, none of them for a position in Victorian literature.  I should have known then that academia was not my destiny.  Perhaps I did, and didn’t care.  The dissertation was, at that time, my way of doing what creative nonfiction does for me now.  It served as a focus for awareness, for insight, and growth.  The faith and doubt crisis of the Victorian era mirrored my own adolescent angst over religion.  What they learned – MacDonald’s mythopoeic resolution of that crisis in particular - I needed to know.    

Setting up a new business is time-consuming, and in some ways frightening in this economy.  In other ways, it is the most secure option.  Tina Brown in The Daily Beast in January coined the term “gig” economy - and then the phrase was everywhere.  Project-by-project work is something artists and other freelancers have always understood, but the economy is now producing what Michelle Goodman, author of The Anti-9 to 5 Guide, has called the "accidental freelancer."  Another blogger, Marci Alboher, has coined the term "slash" career to describe the entrepreneur that applies her skills in multiple markets, and claims this sort of flexibility is the only real job security to be had in any economy.  (I cannot help but think of slash fiction, which is something quite different – unless Marci is also a Harry Potter fan.)   We are seeing a lot of new terms coined these days - perhaps more than we are seeing coinage.  But in truth I feel a lot better about working for several clients and paying for my own health insurance than putting all my eggs in one  employee basket these days.

And it was a choice, not an accident.

There have been a couple of months, especially at the beginning of the year, when cash flow has been pretty scary.  The mortgage and association fees are high, and my house is now worth less than when I bought it.  The loans I have taken out while both kids have been in school have been coming due.  And there are running credit card balances – always anathema to me -  acquired during those few months of unemployment in late 2006 and early 2007, that I just don’t seem to be able to pay down. Apparently Suze Orman doesn’t want me to till I have six months of emergency savings, which is some consolation.  Still, I have yet to figure out how to do that.  When my dad learned what I could charge on an hourly rate, he multiplied that by forty hours and fifty weeks and came up with $170,000 a year.  If I could really do that well writing grants, he said, my money problems would be over. 

I can’t, of course.  At least I don’t know any grantwriters who do.  You actually have to spend about a third of your time prospecting for new business – networking, staying up to date on current issues, attending meetings.  Few of these things are billable to other people, but they take up time.  Then there are the leads that don’t lead anywhere, the clients who for one reason or another take more time than you are authorized to charge them for, and the jobs that, for whatever reason, do not go as planned.  Sometimes you can bill for them, and sometimes you can’t. 

At any rate, it will be awhile before I find myself with a six figure income.

There is also the feast or famine phenomenon.  In the early part of the year I had few new opportunities – now there are often more than I can handle, and on short notice.   Recovery Act requests for proposals have been coming out fast and thick the last few months, with increasing urgency now so that proposals can be reviewed and money can allocated before the end of the federal fiscal year on September 30.  A lot of nonprofits who have never applied for federal funding before are trying to do so now.  Often they think they can handle the very complicated process themselves, in their spare time, and only realize two weeks before the grant is due that they need help.  This is the type of job established grantwriters run screaming from.  I’m not established, so I take the job.  And scream silently.

In truth I am not a person who likes deadlines. I can handle them, unless they bunch up like fabric beneath the foot of a sewing machine.  But I don’t like to.  I am chronically late these days, trying desperately to get “just one more thing done,” and would prefer to have been born before the invention of train schedules.  Deadlines are good motivators, and helpful in some ways for perfectionists.  But when I find my life lurching from one to another with little time for sleep or leisure, to nurture relationships, or do to that daydreaming Brenda Ueland says is so necessary to the creative life, I become tense, anxious, and depressed.  There were a few weeks recently when the days were for gathering information and making appointments, and the nights were for writing.  Sleep found room where it could.  I would like fewer deadlines, less often.  But for now, the trick is learning how to choose among options, and find balance.  

I do love the freedom of being my own boss, and working at home.  And I love the days without deadlines, when I can go into fugue state if I want to, and spend all day on a single project –like catching up on my blog.  And I love the variety of this work.  I love learning about the issues, and the ways in which compassionate and talented people strive to address them, to serve the public good. Most of all I love the fact that my writing can provide the resources to make change happen in the world.  Preparing a strong case for an organization and getting them funding is a gratifying, heady, powerful high.  And it feels a lot more like a real contribution than a dissertation on microfiche sitting on a dusty shelf on Zeeb Road in Ann Arbor.  Though it is fun, after a few drinks at cocktail parties, to take out the large volume bound in black with my name in gold letters, and make guests Touch the Book. 

Perhaps I will have to have my avant garde artist friend Tom Cassidy illustrate it someday.  I do not believe he has ever defaced a dissertation. 

Up until now my business has been focused on grantwriting, and the name and tagline I have used for that business, which has never been formally incorporated, has reflected that.  Formula 501c3:  We Make Nonprofits Shine.  The old brochure and price sheet, which I hardly ever needed,  used 1950s retro clipart of a housewife  in high heels and a housedress, spiffing up the lampshade with a feather duster. 

Then a mysterious thing happened.  As an introvert, organizational life often saps my creativity, and leaves me starving for solitude.  Though the original Ordinary Time began as a column in a church newsletter, the first piece was written on a Sunday morning, in the reprieve from service given by a sick child.  Much of my time as a clergy wife reflects this paradox. 

But for reasons I do not entirely understand, when I work to grow capacity in Northstar, the Little Storytelling  Organization That Could, my personal creativity and my productivity flourish.  It seems that my private creativity is tied in some tangible way to the creative capacity of all.  This means something. 

So it is time to rethink my earlier approach, to create an artistic vision statement and a business plan simultaneously, and have them inform each other.  To bring my whole self to the work.  When that is done, I think I will know again – in both the secular and the sacred sense – the meaning of ordinary time.  Because this, as the Buddhist teacher Jack Kornfield says, is my path with heart.

Mar. 30th, 2009

Two Falling Voices

This story was told as part of a performance, Saving Pagan Babies:  Catholic Culture Clashes, featuring myself, Ann Reay, Loren Niemi, and Curt Lund at the Spirit in the House Festival, February 27-March 9, 2009.  I am grateful to my fellow performers for helping me shape this story, and for producing such jewels of their own; to storytellers Nancy Donoval and Regina Carpenter, who provided incredibly useful feedback; to Dean J. Seal and the volunteers that made Spirit in the House possible, and to Northstar Storytelling League for providing promotional support. 

In retelling history, I have stuck to facts whenever possible, but allowed myself to imagine and infer motives and conversations. In addition to the sources on the life of Mary Jemison cited in this story, and my own independent research on the Sullivan campaign, I want to acknowledge the influence of Deborah Larsen’s historical fiction The White, published in 2001, a stunningly beautiful book which gave me additional insight into the character of Mary Jemison.  

In the storytelling community it is often said that not everything in a story need be factual, but all of it must be true.  May this be so.     

*****

 When the people of the longhouse, the Henosaunee, returned to the Chemung River Valley in the spring of 1780, after the Sullivan Campaign against the Six Nations, they found the corpses of pack horses - the horses that had carried Sullivan’s cannons, driven to exhaustion, slaughtered on the scorched earth. 

Forty towns of the Six Nations  –Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, Tuscarora, Mohawk… Oneida  – were no more.  Twelve hundred longhouses, a million bushels of corn, and beans, and squash – the Three Sisters - torched.  That winter hunger had put an end to the oldest democracy in the world – the Iroquois Confederacy – to make way for our own. 

The Seneca warrior Hiokatoo turned in disgust to his chief.  “What kind of savages would treat an animal this way?”

“They are Christians,” Cornplanter replied.  “Their God had a Son who took their place and died for their sins.  What they do to horses does not matter to them.”

Hiokatoo got down from his own horse:  sleek, powerful, its eyes dark and liquid.  They were Seneca eyes.  “The God of the whites is no Great Spirit.  He is small and mean and stupid.”  Hiokatoo began to gather the bones for burial. 

Cornplanter watched the warrior in silence.  He had seen Hiokatoo kill a white captive by nailing one end of his intestine to a post and letting the raiding party take turns chasing the man with hot pokers till he disemboweled himself.  The wife of Hiokatoo was a white captive.  Cornplanter’s father was white.  Cornplanter got down off his horse to help bury the bones. 

They left the skulls there to shame us.  Staggered them along the trail like Stations of the Cross.  When the settlers came they named the town Horseheads, in honor of the Revolutionary War Hero General John Sullivan.  The Chemung County Historical Society says Horseheads is “the only town in the United States dedicated to the service of the American military horse.”

*****

It’s the town I grew up in. 

 In 1965 I was nine, and my family moved into our new house on the outskirts of Horseheads, a house we built ourselves, like pioneers.  The lot was on the edge of a golf course, so we would always have a nice view of nature.  My favorite book that year was Indian Captive:  The Story of Mary Jemison.  It was a true story. I loved the blue-eyed, blonde haired girl ripped from her white family at twelve during the French and Indian War and adopted by the Seneca, who named her “Corn Tassel” because of her yellow hair – her beautiful yellow hair.  A homesick girl who, when a trader finally told her that her family was all dead, realized this was her home, and learned to love the Indians.  

I loved Lois Lenski’s Indians too - their gracefully rounded faces and hands, limbs sturdy like trees, like trees that lift and move and carry, trees that build things.  I looked for their world beneath my own – beneath the blacktop and the golf course and the housing developments.  I couldn’t find it. I wanted to live in that world.  

I took the book out from the library five times in a row. 

Eventually Mrs. Berlozan told me that until there were two more names on the card that were not mine, I was not allowed to check the book out again.

I didn’t know how Our Lady would feel about my liking this Mary so much.  Had she died a martyr, thrown to lions or shut in a tower or gored to death by a mad cow, it would have been different.  But she lived, and she lived a pagan.  I tried not to think about it. 

Our Lady was my favorite part of being Catholic.  She had her own altar, her own statue and candles.  God the Father was scary, Jesus too perfect, the Holy Spirit…hard to get a grip on.  Mary interceded for you, like mothers do.  I loved the rosary, the click of beads, the grave beauty of the Latin phrases:  Ave Maria, gratia plena, Dominus tecum. Hail Mary, full of Grace.  The Lord is with Thee.  Sancta Maria, Mater Dei,  ora pro nobis peccatoribus, Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners. 

I could follow along with the English in my St. Joseph’s Missal, but I really didn’t need to:  it sounded like prayer.  An older brother of a Protestant friend of mine had called Latin a dead language, which confused me.  What did that mean, dead language?  It seemed very alive to me – as alive as Jesus and Mary were, certainly, although they lived on this earth a very long time ago.  And if I’d learned anything in church, it was that there was more than one way to be alive. 

My father was a Protestant.  Not as bad as being a pagan, but bad. Sister had shown us that when Protestants pray, they hold their hands like this, with their fingers laced together – but when Catholics pray, they hold their hands like this, pointed upward to God, their thumbs in the shape of a cross.  And whose prayers do you think are going to heaven? Sister asked.   

That was when I was taken captive.

*****

“It will be better for us,” my mother said, “to worship together as a family,” “And to pray in English.”  My Protestant friend’s older brother agreed.  People should worship in the vernacular.  I looked the word up.  It meant “native to a country.”  It was from the Latin, vernaculus.  Go figure.

St. Matthew’s Protestant Episcopal Church was musty and dark, like the papery leaves of the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. The Mass – no, the service – was in English:  the King’s English, the language of Shakespeare.  What was native about that? 

We have left undone those things which we ought to have done; And we have done those things which we ought not to have done; And there is no health in us. 

There were old people everywhere.  Their papery skin was lined with such prayers.  Even the children looked old. 

At St. Matthews, they only brought Mary out with the other decorations at Christmas. She had no altar, and no one called her Our Lady or said prayers to her in any language.   

I needed a Mary.

After Mrs. Berlozan forbade me to check out Lois Lenski’s book, I did a risky thing.   I went to the adult section of the public library.   

I found  the 1824 biography by James Seaver, who interviewed Mary Jemison in her nineties.  His sentences were long and sanctimonious, like the Book of Common Prayer.  Yet beneath that voice, I found the voice of Mary.  Her native voice. 

It was not Corn Tassel’s. 

 My hair was chestnut.  Not blonde.

I knew from the beginning they were dead. Two days after they put the moccasins on my feet and separated me from the rest, I watched my family’s scalps prepared, scraped and stretched and dried over the camp fire.  I recognized my mother’s red hair. 

The Seneca sisters who adopted me named me Dehewamis, Two Falling Voices, because I took their brother’s place and ended their mourning.  My sisters loved me, as they loved him.  When I could feel at all, I hated them. 

But eventually winter turns to spring, as it always does.  And my sisters were persistent.  It is hard not to love back.  And things were better; my life was better, when I could love again.

I might have been twelve when I was captured.  I might have been sixteen.  I can’t remember.   

My marriage to Sheninjee was an arranged marriage, but  eventually winter turned to spring, as it always does.  I found I loved him.

It was my right as a Seneca woman to name our children. I named my son Thomas, after my father.  Then a fever killed Sheninjee.  And winter came.     

After the French and Indian War, after the death of Sheninjee, the King of England offered a bounty to anyone willing to ransom white captives.  The Seneca chief said  I had a choice.  I would not be taken against my will.  

I considered this.  I could still speak English, although I had forgotten how to read or write and  I no longer knew the Christian prayers.   I looked at my brown Thomas . He had the dark eyes of Sheninjee.  

I chose not to be redeemed. 

In the spring, when Thomas was three I caught the eye of the great warrior Hiokatoo.  I found myself looking back.   It was not an arranged marriage.  I chose him. 

The courtship was a strange one. He told me stories, as warriors do.  My sister thought he was bragging.  He told me every brutal thing he had ever done.  But at the end of each story, he would search my face, as if to say,  This is what it means to be a brave.  This is who I am.  Can you face it?  I opened to him. 

We had six more children.  All in all I had three sons and four daughters.  I gave them all Christian names.  They took the  place of the family I had lost.  Perhaps that was wrong.

After the Sullivan campaign, before the Winter of Hunger, I hired myself out as a farm hand so my family had corn. In the treaty with the colonies, I came to own land. And I became…naturalized. A naturalized citizen of the United States. 

Eventually, Hiokatoo died of consumption, well past one hundred, still telling stories to anyone who would listen.  Not his sons.  Whiskey told them stories.  

In his fifties John, his firstborn, my second, murdered first Thomas, then James.  Finally strong spirits brought a tomahawk to John’s head too, spilled his brains.

I buried all three.   

I was glad Hiokatoo had been spared this. This was not what it meant to be a brave.   I faced it for him.  Took his place.

 *****

On the outskirts of Horseheads, on the edge of a golf course, I grew up in the home my parents built. Houses rose up around us, one or two new ones each summer, till the creek bed went mysteriously dry, and the fields full of puff balls and thistles, milkweed pods and garter snakes were gone, and the green was all for sport. 

On Saturday morning, the construction workers were on overtime.  People were eager to move in.  I went downstairs and sat in a patch of sunlight coming in from the bay window.  The light poured down,  a wave of particles, full of the dust unto which we shall return. 

The house was quiet, I thought, until the refrigerator motor suddenly went off.  No, this was quiet.  A turtle dove sighed in the chimney.  Then the metallic clunk of the machinery began again, drilling a new Artesian well. 

Perhaps she thought it was the grinding of corn. Perhaps the scrape of a scalping knife, the beating of drums before a gauntlet was run, the clinking of coins in a false redemption. 

A volume of the encyclopedia was next to me, open to those plastic overlays of geological strata, The names sounded like books of the Bible:  Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus; Igneous, Sedimentary, Metamorphic.  The shaft hammered down, drilling for water.  Ave Maria, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.

 I let my prayers drill down, down, past ranch houses and farm houses and log cabins, till they struck the soft thatch of a longhouse, and the Finger Lakes filled with living water and their names once more held the flowing vowels of the Iroquois: Seneca, Keuka, Cayuga, Owasco, Canandaigua. 

And there she was, the thick chestnut braids tumbling down, the beaded buckskin tunic, the trousers, the moccasins.  Mary Queen of Captives, Two Falling Voices, ora pro nobis peccatoribus.  

Praying for me. 

Jan. 6th, 2009

Epiphany

The Random House Unabridged Dictionary has four definitions of epiphany, only one of which – “a Christian festival, observed on January 6, commemorating the manifestation of Christ to the gentiles in the persons of the Magi” – is capitalized.  Since there’s not enough capital to go around these days, we will skip that one.

The word is also used to refer to “an appearance or manifestation, esp. of a deity.”  Well.  No deities here.  Thunder, lightning, the heavens opening up, doves descending – way too much drama for me. 

Here’s the most you can hope for in Ordinary Time:  “a sudden, intuitive perception of or insight into the reality or essential meaning of something” – anything will do – “usually initiated by some simple, homely, or commonplace occurrence or experience.”  The existence of which  would make this entry fulfill definition #4, “a literary work or section of a work presenting, usually symbolically, such a moment of revelation and insight.” 

And in fact I must take issue with Random House where the word “sudden” is concerned.  There is something sudden about an epiphany.  A moment when things coalesce and you know that that moment is charged with meaning.  But for most of us, unpacking those experiences is the task of a lifetime.  If it were not, there would be no need for stories. 

Maggie spent her junior semester abroad at the University of Ghana in Accra, leaving in February and returning in June.  At least in body. It was a complex experience, and she was not entirely happy there – but she longs to go back.  She both loved and hated being obruni – a word that means both foreigner and white person.  To be perceived as exotic and interesting is a heady, if sometimes inconvenient, experience. Obruni, obruni, buy something from me! Obruni, I love you!  I want to marry you, obruni

She wrote a great deal about her time in Ghana in her online journal; and I’ve done the maternal midrash on some of the things she told me in mine.  But the epiphany she had while on the package tour of Elmina Castle, where captured slaves were held before being packed into ships and sent to the New World – the world from which she came - is still working its way into story, and will be for some time.   

She has written some about the experience.  How she stood in the women’s dungeon and could still smell the stink of excrement and tears that had been absorbed by the rock walls. About the claustrophobia, and her overwhelming sense of complicity and guilt. About how she and the other members of her group – mostly white women, as it happened - came back up to the sunlight and the fresh air.  And freedom. 

Or so she thought. 

In the courtyard, the male guide told the story.  “The Governors never brought their wives with them, because they died of malaria. But they would still want women, so they would take the African women.” And the women were brought out into the courtyard, covered in their own filth, and one would be chosen for a public bath.  Then the Governor would rape her, and when he was done, the officers, and then the soldiers, and then the clergy would take their turn.  What was left of her at the end would be sent back down to the dungeon. 

Above the courtyard, standing on the promenade, was another group:  the Legon class of Ghanaian men. Well.  They were young men, 14 or 15, most of them.  Horsing around. They joked in pidgin as the guide told the story.  And they pointed. Maggie understood enough pidgin to know what was being said.  That one is mine.  I’ll take that one.  Hey, obruni.  You need a bath!  And that was when she realized that the story the man told was not about the women, or their pain, or their suffering.  “And they took our women and raped them.”  Our women.  Our women.

Shame and anger.  Is it one epiphany or two to be hit, suddenly, by two conflicting emotions?   And what is the reality or essential meaning of that simple, commonplace, homely symbol, the possessive pronoun?  What does it mean to belong to someone – really?  For reasons that are at once deeply personal, culturally conditioned, and political, my daughter works her own story out in fear and trembling.  And as stories are the only salvation I believe in anymore – as well as the only damnation – I watch her with fear and trembling of my own.  And pride.  And great love.

Previous 10